Hi LightDot, Thanks for the remind. Actually WYMeditor was on my radar. I love its clean output code philosophy. However its default look-and-feel could surprise my end users, I am afraid. For example, those heading 1/2/3/.../6 containers look scary red when editing, although they look "normal" again when previewing. See http://files.wymeditor.org/wymeditor/trunk/src/examples/01-basic.html
Maybe WYMeditor does this on purpose, but I expect an editing experience would be less surprising to end users. (The least- surprising rule when designing a UI.) That said, I think that is "just" a css issue. So if someday I found a handy css for it, then I would fall in love with WYMeditor. Regards, Ray On Dec 22, 1:45 am, LightDot <light...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree, most of the better known editors are bloated. I try to keep away > if I can, especially from tiny and ckeditor. I haven't used elrte before, > it seems a bit better. I have used jHtmlArea on a couple of projects with > success, but lately I prefer WYMeditor. The .js is about 120kb minified, > though, so still way bigger that jHtmlArea. > > It's a strict XHTML WYSIWYM editor (not WYSIWYG, looks even better as far > as I'm concerned). It needs a bit of UI polishing, but it produces great > code. If anyone tries it out, I strongly suggest using the latest beta > releases or the code from the repo. Old stable releases are pretty stale. > > https://github.com/wymeditor/wymeditor
