Yeah probably is I already have it with web2py but it is slow with 20,000
nodes takes around 5-10 seconds to load the results.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Richard Vézina <ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I made a lot of that last year... Sometimes it was driving me nuts,
> needing to have the same columns for each table in the union... Good naming
> convention helps to make thing clearer when you get back to the code...
>
> Note, I would try to make it with web2py first if I were needing to write
> those code again.
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Bruce Wade <bruce.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah not sure have never used recursion at the database level. However it
>> seems to be the only option, none of the other options in that chapter fit
>> my needs.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Richard Vézina <
>> ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Recursion is slow because the union... But it may fit yours need better
>>> I don't know.
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Wade <bruce.w...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok so I have read the chapter I think the best option is postgres
>>>> recursive queries.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Richard Vézina <
>>>> ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes AntiPattern cover 4 or 5 kind of tree representation, classify
>>>>> them depending of usage and gives pros and cons.
>>>>>
>>>>> I choose Closure table since it was one of the more complet for my
>>>>> case. But if parent node is changing frequently it's not the more 
>>>>> effecient
>>>>> tree antipattern.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have look it is pretty instructive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Book contain little more explanation, but there is this slide :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/billkarwin/practical-object-oriented-models-in-sql
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:32 AM, stefaan <stefaan.hi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well I know the major bottle neck in the site is the binary tree. I
>>>>>>> am still trying to figure out how to do this the best and most 
>>>>>>> efficient.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe this could be useful:
>>>>>> http://dirtsimple.org/2010/11/simplest-way-to-do-tree-based-queries.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bruce Wade
>>>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
>>>> http://www.wadecybertech.com
>>>> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
>>>> http://www.warplydesigned.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Bruce Wade
>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
>> http://www.wadecybertech.com
>> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
>> http://www.warplydesigned.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
-- 
Regards,
Bruce Wade
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
http://www.wadecybertech.com
http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
http://www.warplydesigned.com

Reply via email to