In the case of Google neither of those is at any particular advantage over the other, except the shorter one would be stronger for the search term 'Video'. So long as it includes the target search-term for that page, the simpler the URL the better and the shorter the better.
e.g. in both cases, get rid of the final '1' (or replace it with a relevant target keyword) , unless you think it's very likely that someone will actually include '1' in their Google search. Otherwise it is just diluting your URL. Make sure the page meta title tag at least approximately matches the target key words used in the URL (and of course, in the content of the page). If possible, use a .com, .net or .org domain name that contains your main target keywords. -- Luc. On Monday, 30 July 2012 08:24:59 UTC+1, Hassan Alnatour wrote: > > Dear Pbreit, > > My URls was like this >>> *Domain.com/Video/1* > > but now i changed everything like this >>>*Domain.com/Video/Guitar/Lesson1/1 > * > > as i know that using Vars or query strings are bad for SEO and that the > Spider ignores it , so do you think this will be effective ? > > > Best Regards, > > > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:47 AM, pbreit <pbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can you give us some examples of your before and after URLs? >> >> In general it shouldn't be a big impact because there are so many >> variables to SEO. It's usually best to construct URLs as makes the most >> sense for your web site. Then you can think about SEO. >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > --
