The #head is now fixed. Please check it. On Saturday, 11 August 2012 11:35:57 UTC-5, villas wrote: > > Hmm, unless you mention what the 'better behaviour' is, it is difficult > to agree as this change does result in broken content. > > In any case, I also believe that 'better behaviour' should also be to try > to retain compatibility with Markdown. There are now two departures from > Markdown with regards header tags. The other one is this: > > Markmin: #Head ----> <p>head</p> > Markdown: #Head ----> <h1>head</h1> > > Many users started using Markmin as a substitute to Markdown. In fact my > company now uses both and the staff have to remember any nit-picking > differences like this. Where it doesn't hurt, it would be great to > harmonise the behaviour, not introduce more differences. > > Best regards, David > > > On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 8:23:49 PM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> There is a manor change of behavior in MARKMIN. >> >> Before: >> >> ----- markmin ---- >> # title >> aaa >> >> bbb >> ------ end markmin ---- >> >> would render as >> >> <h1>title<h1><p>aaa</p><p>bbbb</p> >> >> After: >> >> the same markmin would render >> >> <h1>title aaa</h1><p>bbbb</p> >> >> In other words now headers (#, ##, ###) can be continued to the next line >> and need an empty new line to be separated from the first paragraph. >> I think the new behavior is better and previous behavior should be >> considered a bug. >> >> Anyway. I just wanted people to know, in case there are major objections. >> >> Massimo >> >> >>
--
