Yes, I guess we just need a few notes to encourage everyone to use it. I was disappointed at first with auth_wiki because I was unsure how to use my previous work with plugin_wiki, but I think I will be able to re-use this making use of the 'component' which is really more flexible.
The flexibility with urls is also really so much better. That was real problem for me with plugin_wiki. On Saturday, September 8, 2012 9:32:19 PM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > Most of the functionality of plugin_wiki is in auth.wiki. Only comments > and star ratings are missing. Everything else is done better in auth.wiki. > yet we provide plugin_comments and plugin_ratings as separate which work > with auth.wik() > > On Saturday, 8 September 2012 14:55:19 UTC-5, apps in tables wrote: >> >> Thanks, Villas >> >> I understand that i can use both. >> >> The first one will be deprecated, but it is documented. >> The second one has better design and integrated, but it is not documented. >> >> I prefer to wait for the second to be documented. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ashraf >> >>> >>> --
