I think it does have some effect.  
I suspect that your existing data may not be unique.  
See whether the following helps:

   - If using commandline,  try with db.commit() after.
   - Try with a new table.
   - Look in databases/sql.log and see whether the field was created with 
   UNIQUE.
   - Use a DB management tool to inspect your DB.



On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:23:16 PM UTC+1, martzi wrote:
>
> Unique = True,  has probably no effect. see below.
> ...
> >>> db = DAL('sqlite://storage.db')
> >>> person = db.define_table('person', Field('name'))
> >>> bodypart = db.define_table('bodypart', Field('name'), Field('owner', 
> 'reference person', unique=True)) #unique= True seems to have no effect
> >>> pid = person.insert(name='Sid')
> >>> bpid = bodypart.insert(name='arms', owner= pid) #pid = 1
> >>> bodypart(bpid).owner #bpid = 1, first insertion of owner as 1
> 1
> >>> bpid = bodypart.insert(name='mouth', owner= pid) # multiple entries 
> not caught, pid is still 1
> >>> bodypart(bpid).owner #bpid = 2, second insertion of owner as 1 AGAIN
> 1
>
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:22:09 PM UTC+2, villas wrote:
>>
>> I am quite familiar with cascade;  I just couldn't figure out how it 
>> could assist you.
>>
>> In my opinion,  Field('....','reference other_table', unique=True)  
>> should be supported and work.  Maybe you added the constraint later and the 
>> DB didn't accept it because you already had duplicated field contents.
>>
>> In any case,  even if unique=True is not working for the moment,  then a 
>> work-around would be to make a unique index on the field yourself.  You'll 
>> have to handle exceptions when the insert/update fails due to duplicate 
>> keys.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 12:48:49 PM UTC+1, martzi wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply. But if you meant Field('....','reference 
>>> other_table', unique=True), I have tried that with failure, i am still 
>>> having a one-to-many relation. FYI: Regarding CASCADE, an  ondelete cascade 
>>> causes deletion of all referred data.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:37:59 PM UTC+2, villas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I may be wrong,  but I do not think Cascade could assist you with 
>>>> enforcing a 1-1 relationship. 
>>>> Maybe making the foreign key field unique would help?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2012 11:45:28 AM UTC+1, martzi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I wonder if there a way to enforce a one to one relationship with 
>>>>> Cascade via web2py  DAL API. ???
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 



Reply via email to