That is a good question. I don't think that the GPL is suitable for
documentation, however there is a GNU documentation license which seems
more appropriate. You can direct them to an Italian translation of it
at:
- http://fly.cnuce.cnr.it/gnu/doc.it/fdl.it.html
I will update the english website (I assume that none of the
documentation translators would object to this). Translators should
point to a version of the translation in their language (find links at
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html#translationsGFDL).
Ian.
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
> An Italian newspaper is asking me under
> which licence the docs on the site are.
>
> In fact, most of the docs didn't mention
> any kind of licence, and I were unable to
> find any general statement on the site.
>
> Wich is the Project official licence ?
>
> GPL ?
>
> THX. Marco
>
>
> /"\
> \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
> X AGAINST HTML MAIL
> / \
>
> * Mac (Marco A. Calamari) [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it *
> * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 *
> * DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B *
> * PGP keys: request keyserver http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/web
PGP signature
