On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Barros Pena, Belen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 09/07/2013 18:42, "Jeff Osier-Mixon" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Speaking ex cathedra (as an ex tech writer) I'd say either Included or >>Installed would work, but the proper term would depend on when this >>table is shown. >> >>Included = included in the build, so it's a pre-build term. >>Installed = installed in the rootfs, so it's a post-build term. >>Deployed = installed onto the target - not appropriate for this list, I >>think. > > This is really helpful, Jeffro. Thanks! > > In our case, it is post-build, so that would mean "Installed". > >> >>As Jason says, packages can be built that are never inserted into the >>rootfs, so if this is a list of all packages in the build, I'd stick >>with Included. > > It is, with a twist. The table content can be filtered, and the default > state of the packages table will have an "installed" filter applied. This > means initially you will see only the packages installed in the rootfs, > but you can of course clear the filter to see all the packages (installed > or not) that have been built. > > In the light of this, do you still think "included" better than > "installed"?
Ah, I see - I misunderstood the point of the table. In that case, Included would not be appropriate. How about "Built"? _______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
