Modified: releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/ChangeLog (242441 => 242442)
--- releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/ChangeLog 2019-03-05 12:40:35 UTC (rev 242441)
+++ releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/ChangeLog 2019-03-05 12:40:38 UTC (rev 242442)
@@ -1,3 +1,52 @@
+2019-02-22 Robin Morisset <rmoris...@apple.com>
+
+ B3ReduceStrength: missing peephole optimizations for binary operations
+ https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194252
+
+ Reviewed by Saam Barati.
+
+ Adds several sets of optimizations for BitAnd, BitOr and BitXor.
+ Using BitAnd distributivity over BitOr and BitXor:
+ Turn any of these (for Op == BitOr || Op == BitXor):
+ Op(BitAnd(x1, x2), BitAnd(x1, x3))
+ Op(BitAnd(x2, x1), BitAnd(x1, x3))
+ Op(BitAnd(x1, x2), BitAnd(x3, x1))
+ Op(BitAnd(x2, x1), BitAnd(x3, x1))
+ Into this: BitAnd(Op(x2, x3), x1)
+ And any of these:
+ Op(BitAnd(x1, x2), x1)
+ Op(BitAnd(x2, x1), x1)
+ Op(x1, BitAnd(x1, x2))
+ Op(x1, BitAnd(x2, x1))
+ Into this: BitAnd(Op(x2, x1), x1)
+ This second set is equivalent to doing x1 => BitAnd(x1, x1), and then applying the first set.
+ Using de Morgan laws (we represent not as BitXor with allOnes):
+ BitAnd(BitXor(x1, allOnes), BitXor(x2, allOnes)) => BitXor(BitOr(x1, x2), allOnes)
+ BitOr(BitXor(x1, allOnes), BitXor(x2, allOnes) => BitXor(BitAnd(x1, x2), allOnes)
+ BitOr(BitXor(x, allOnes), c) => BitXor(BitAnd(x, ~c), allOnes)
+ BitAnd(BitXor(x, allOnes), c) => BitXor(BitOr(x, ~c), allOnes)
+ The latter two are equivalent to doing c => BitXor(~c, allOnes), and then applying the former two.
+
+ All of these transformations either reduce the number of operations (which we always do when possible), or bring the _expression_ closer to having:
+ - BitXor with all ones at the outermost
+ - then BitAnd
+ - then other BitXor
+ - then BitOr at the innermost.
+ These transformations that don't directly reduce the number of operations are still useful for normalization (helping things like CSE), and also can enable
+ more optimizations (for example BitXor with all ones can easily cancel each other once they are all at the outermost level).
+
+ * b3/B3ReduceStrength.cpp:
+ * b3/testb3.cpp:
+ (JSC::B3::testBitAndNotNot):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitAndNotImm):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitOrAndAndArgs):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitOrAndSameArgs):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitOrNotNot):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitOrNotImm):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitXorAndAndArgs):
+ (JSC::B3::testBitXorAndSameArgs):
+ (JSC::B3::run):
+
2019-02-22 Yusuke Suzuki <ysuz...@apple.com>
Unreviewed, build fix after r241954
Modified: releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/b3/B3ReduceStrength.cpp (242441 => 242442)
--- releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/b3/B3ReduceStrength.cpp 2019-03-05 12:40:35 UTC (rev 242441)
+++ releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/b3/B3ReduceStrength.cpp 2019-03-05 12:40:38 UTC (rev 242442)
@@ -962,8 +962,8 @@
// Turn this: BitAnd(value, all-ones)
// Into this: value.
- if ((m_value->type() == Int64 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(0xffffffffffffffff))
- || (m_value->type() == Int32 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(0xffffffff))) {
+ if ((m_value->type() == Int64 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()))
+ || (m_value->type() == Int32 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()))) {
replaceWithIdentity(m_value->child(0));
break;
}
@@ -984,6 +984,7 @@
&& !(m_value->child(1)->asInt32() & 0xffffff00)) {
m_value->child(0) = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
m_changed = true;
+ break;
}
// Turn this: BitAnd(SExt16(value), mask) where (mask & 0xffff0000) == 0
@@ -992,6 +993,7 @@
&& !(m_value->child(1)->asInt32() & 0xffff0000)) {
m_value->child(0) = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
m_changed = true;
+ break;
}
// Turn this: BitAnd(SExt32(value), mask) where (mask & 0xffffffff00000000) == 0
@@ -1002,6 +1004,7 @@
m_index, ZExt32, m_value->origin(),
m_value->child(0)->child(0), m_value->child(0)->child(1));
m_changed = true;
+ break;
}
// Turn this: BitAnd(Op(value, constant1), constant2)
@@ -1023,7 +1026,40 @@
default:
break;
}
+ break;
}
+
+ // Turn this: BitAnd(BitXor(x1, allOnes), BitXor(x2, allOnes)
+ // Into this: BitXor(BitOr(x1, x2), allOnes)
+ // By applying De Morgan laws
+ if (m_value->child(0)->opcode() == BitXor
+ && m_value->child(1)->opcode() == BitXor
+ && ((m_value->type() == Int64
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max())
+ && m_value->child(1)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()))
+ || (m_value->type() == Int32
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max())
+ && m_value->child(1)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max())))) {
+ Value* bitOr = m_insertionSet.insert<Value>(m_index, BitOr, m_value->origin(), m_value->child(0)->child(0), m_value->child(1)->child(0));
+ replaceWithNew<Value>(BitXor, m_value->origin(), bitOr, m_value->child(1)->child(1));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // Turn this: BitAnd(BitXor(x, allOnes), c)
+ // Into this: BitXor(BitOr(x, ~c), allOnes)
+ // This is a variation on the previous optimization, treating c as if it were BitXor(~c, allOnes)
+ // It does not reduce the number of operations, but provides some normalization (we try to get BitXor by allOnes at the outermost point), and some chance to float Xors to a place where they might get eliminated.
+ if (m_value->child(0)->opcode() == BitXor
+ && m_value->child(1)->hasInt()
+ && ((m_value->type() == Int64
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()))
+ || (m_value->type() == Int32
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max())))) {
+ Value* bitOr = m_insertionSet.insert<Value>(m_index, BitOr, m_value->origin(), m_value->child(0)->child(0), m_value->child(1)->bitXorConstant(m_proc, m_value->child(0)->child(1)));
+ replaceWithNew<Value>(BitXor, m_value->origin(), bitOr, m_value->child(0)->child(1));
+ break;
+ }
+
break;
case BitOr:
@@ -1064,12 +1100,46 @@
// Turn this: BitOr(value, all-ones)
// Into this: all-ones.
- if ((m_value->type() == Int64 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(0xffffffffffffffff))
- || (m_value->type() == Int32 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(0xffffffff))) {
+ if ((m_value->type() == Int64 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()))
+ || (m_value->type() == Int32 && m_value->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()))) {
replaceWithIdentity(m_value->child(1));
break;
}
+ // Turn this: BitOr(BitXor(x1, allOnes), BitXor(x2, allOnes)
+ // Into this: BitXor(BitAnd(x1, x2), allOnes)
+ // By applying De Morgan laws
+ if (m_value->child(0)->opcode() == BitXor
+ && m_value->child(1)->opcode() == BitXor
+ && ((m_value->type() == Int64
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max())
+ && m_value->child(1)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()))
+ || (m_value->type() == Int32
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max())
+ && m_value->child(1)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max())))) {
+ Value* bitAnd = m_insertionSet.insert<Value>(m_index, BitAnd, m_value->origin(), m_value->child(0)->child(0), m_value->child(1)->child(0));
+ replaceWithNew<Value>(BitXor, m_value->origin(), bitAnd, m_value->child(1)->child(1));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // Turn this: BitOr(BitXor(x, allOnes), c)
+ // Into this: BitXor(BitAnd(x, ~c), allOnes)
+ // This is a variation on the previous optimization, treating c as if it were BitXor(~c, allOnes)
+ // It does not reduce the number of operations, but provides some normalization (we try to get BitXor by allOnes at the outermost point), and some chance to float Xors to a place where they might get eliminated.
+ if (m_value->child(0)->opcode() == BitXor
+ && m_value->child(1)->hasInt()
+ && ((m_value->type() == Int64
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()))
+ || (m_value->type() == Int32
+ && m_value->child(0)->child(1)->isInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max())))) {
+ Value* bitAnd = m_insertionSet.insert<Value>(m_index, BitAnd, m_value->origin(), m_value->child(0)->child(0), m_value->child(1)->bitXorConstant(m_proc, m_value->child(0)->child(1)));
+ replaceWithNew<Value>(BitXor, m_value->origin(), bitAnd, m_value->child(0)->child(1));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (handleBitAndDistributivity())
+ break;
+
break;
case BitXor:
@@ -1116,6 +1186,9 @@
replaceWithIdentity(m_value->child(0));
break;
}
+
+ if (handleBitAndDistributivity())
+ break;
break;
@@ -2210,6 +2283,70 @@
}
}
+ // For Op==BitOr or BitXor, turn any of these:
+ // Op(BitAnd(x1, x2), BitAnd(x1, x3))
+ // Op(BitAnd(x2, x1), BitAnd(x1, x3))
+ // Op(BitAnd(x1, x2), BitAnd(x3, x1))
+ // Op(BitAnd(x2, x1), BitAnd(x3, x1))
+ // Into this: BitAnd(Op(x2, x3), x1)
+ // And any of these:
+ // Op(BitAnd(x1, x2), x1)
+ // Op(BitAnd(x2, x1), x1)
+ // Op(x1, BitAnd(x1, x2))
+ // Op(x1, BitAnd(x2, x1))
+ // Into this: BitAnd(Op(x2, x1), x1)
+ // This second set is equivalent to doing x1 => BitAnd(x1, x1), and then applying the first set.
+ // It does not reduce the number of operations executed, but provides some useful normalization: we prefer to have BitAnd at the outermost, then BitXor, and finally BitOr at the innermost
+ bool handleBitAndDistributivity()
+ {
+ ASSERT(m_value->opcode() == BitOr || m_value->opcode() == BitXor);
+ Value* x1 = nullptr;
+ Value* x2 = nullptr;
+ Value* x3 = nullptr;
+ if (m_value->child(0)->opcode() == BitAnd && m_value->child(1)->opcode() == BitAnd) {
+ if (m_value->child(0)->child(0) == m_value->child(1)->child(0)) {
+ x1 = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
+ x2 = m_value->child(0)->child(1);
+ x3 = m_value->child(1)->child(1);
+ } else if (m_value->child(0)->child(1) == m_value->child(1)->child(0)) {
+ x1 = m_value->child(0)->child(1);
+ x2 = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
+ x3 = m_value->child(1)->child(1);
+ } else if (m_value->child(0)->child(0) == m_value->child(1)->child(1)) {
+ x1 = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
+ x2 = m_value->child(0)->child(1);
+ x3 = m_value->child(1)->child(0);
+ } else if (m_value->child(0)->child(1) == m_value->child(1)->child(1)) {
+ x1 = m_value->child(0)->child(1);
+ x2 = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
+ x3 = m_value->child(1)->child(0);
+ }
+ } else if (m_value->child(0)->opcode() == BitAnd) {
+ if (m_value->child(0)->child(0) == m_value->child(1)) {
+ x1 = x3 = m_value->child(1);
+ x2 = m_value->child(0)->child(1);
+ } else if (m_value->child(0)->child(1) == m_value->child(1)) {
+ x1 = x3 = m_value->child(1);
+ x2 = m_value->child(0)->child(0);
+ }
+ } else if (m_value->child(1)->opcode() == BitAnd) {
+ if (m_value->child(1)->child(0) == m_value->child(0)) {
+ x1 = x3 = m_value->child(0);
+ x2 = m_value->child(1)->child(1);
+ } else if (m_value->child(1)->child(1) == m_value->child(0)) {
+ x1 = x3 = m_value->child(0);
+ x2 = m_value->child(1)->child(0);
+ }
+ }
+ if (x1 != nullptr) {
+ ASSERT(x2 != nullptr && x3 != nullptr);
+ Value* bitOp = m_insertionSet.insert<Value>(m_index, m_value->opcode(), m_value->origin(), x2, x3);
+ replaceWithNew<Value>(BitAnd, m_value->origin(), bitOp, x1);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
+
struct CanonicalizedComparison {
Opcode opcode;
Value* operands[2];
Modified: releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/b3/testb3.cpp (242441 => 242442)
--- releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/b3/testb3.cpp 2019-03-05 12:40:35 UTC (rev 242441)
+++ releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-2.24/Source/_javascript_Core/b3/testb3.cpp 2019-03-05 12:40:38 UTC (rev 242442)
@@ -2486,6 +2486,41 @@
CHECK(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a) == a);
}
+void testBitAndNotNot(int64_t a, int64_t b)
+{
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* argB = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR1);
+ Value* notA = root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argA, root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), -1));
+ Value* notB = root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argB, root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), -1));
+ root->appendNewControlValue(
+ proc, Return, Origin(),
+ root->appendNew<Value>(
+ proc, BitAnd, Origin(),
+ notA,
+ notB));
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b), (~a & ~b));
+}
+
+void testBitAndNotImm(int64_t a, int64_t b)
+{
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* notA = root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argA, root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), -1));
+ Value* cstB = root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), b);
+ root->appendNewControlValue(
+ proc, Return, Origin(),
+ root->appendNew<Value>(
+ proc, BitAnd, Origin(),
+ notA,
+ cstB));
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b), (~a & b));
+}
+
void testBitAndImms(int64_t a, int64_t b)
{
Procedure proc;
@@ -2870,6 +2905,91 @@
CHECK(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a) == a);
}
+void testBitOrAndAndArgs(int64_t a, int64_t b, int64_t c)
+{
+ // We want to check every possible ordering of arguments (to properly check every path in B3ReduceStrength):
+ // ((a & b) | (a & c))
+ // ((a & b) | (c & a))
+ // ((b & a) | (a & c))
+ // ((b & a) | (c & a))
+ for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* argB = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR1);
+ Value* argC = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR2);
+ Value* andAB = i & 2 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argA, argB)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argB, argA);
+ Value* andAC = i & 1 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argA, argC)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argC, argA);
+ root->appendNewControlValue(
+ proc, Return, Origin(),
+ root->appendNew<Value>(
+ proc, BitOr, Origin(),
+ andAB,
+ andAC));
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b, c), ((a & b) | (a & c)));
+ }
+}
+
+void testBitOrAndSameArgs(int64_t a, int64_t b)
+{
+ // We want to check every possible ordering of arguments (to properly check every path in B3ReduceStrength):
+ // ((a & b) | a)
+ // ((b & a) | a)
+ // (a | (a & b))
+ // (a | (b & a))
+ for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* argB = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR1);
+ Value* andAB = i & 1 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argA, argB)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argB, argA);
+ Value* result = i & 2 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitOr, Origin(), andAB, argA)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitOr, Origin(), argA, andAB);
+ root->appendNewControlValue(proc, Return, Origin(), result);
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b), ((a & b) | a));
+ }
+}
+
+void testBitOrNotNot(int64_t a, int64_t b)
+{
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* argB = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR1);
+ Value* notA = root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argA, root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), -1));
+ Value* notB = root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argB, root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), -1));
+ root->appendNewControlValue(
+ proc, Return, Origin(),
+ root->appendNew<Value>(
+ proc, BitOr, Origin(),
+ notA,
+ notB));
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b), (~a | ~b));
+}
+
+void testBitOrNotImm(int64_t a, int64_t b)
+{
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* notA = root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argA, root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), -1));
+ Value* cstB = root->appendNew<Const64Value>(proc, Origin(), b);
+ root->appendNewControlValue(
+ proc, Return, Origin(),
+ root->appendNew<Value>(
+ proc, BitOr, Origin(),
+ notA,
+ cstB));
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b), (~a | b));
+}
+
void testBitOrImms(int64_t a, int64_t b)
{
Procedure proc;
@@ -3232,6 +3352,56 @@
CHECK(!compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a));
}
+void testBitXorAndAndArgs(int64_t a, int64_t b, int64_t c)
+{
+ // We want to check every possible ordering of arguments (to properly check every path in B3ReduceStrength):
+ // ((a & b) ^ (a & c))
+ // ((a & b) ^ (c & a))
+ // ((b & a) ^ (a & c))
+ // ((b & a) ^ (c & a))
+ for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* argB = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR1);
+ Value* argC = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR2);
+ Value* andAB = i & 2 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argA, argB)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argB, argA);
+ Value* andAC = i & 1 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argA, argC)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argC, argA);
+ root->appendNewControlValue(
+ proc, Return, Origin(),
+ root->appendNew<Value>(
+ proc, BitXor, Origin(),
+ andAB,
+ andAC));
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b, c), ((a & b) ^ (a & c)));
+ }
+}
+
+void testBitXorAndSameArgs(int64_t a, int64_t b)
+{
+ // We want to check every possible ordering of arguments (to properly check every path in B3ReduceStrength):
+ // ((a & b) ^ a)
+ // ((b & a) ^ a)
+ // (a ^ (a & b))
+ // (a ^ (b & a))
+ for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
+ Procedure proc;
+ BasicBlock* root = proc.addBlock();
+ Value* argA = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR0);
+ Value* argB = root->appendNew<ArgumentRegValue>(proc, Origin(), GPRInfo::argumentGPR1);
+ Value* andAB = i & 1 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argA, argB)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitAnd, Origin(), argB, argA);
+ Value* result = i & 2 ? root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), andAB, argA)
+ : root->appendNew<Value>(proc, BitXor, Origin(), argA, andAB);
+ root->appendNewControlValue(proc, Return, Origin(), result);
+
+ CHECK_EQ(compileAndRun<int64_t>(proc, a, b), ((a & b) ^ a));
+ }
+}
+
void testBitXorImms(int64_t a, int64_t b)
{
Procedure proc;
@@ -16452,6 +16622,22 @@
})); \
} \
}
+#define RUN_TERNARY(test, valuesA, valuesB, valuesC) \
+ for (auto a : valuesA) { \
+ for (auto b : valuesB) { \
+ for (auto c : valuesC) { \
+ CString testStr = toCString(#test, "(", a.name, ", ", b.name, ",", c.name, ")"); \
+ if (!shouldRun(testStr.data())) \
+ continue; \
+ tasks.append(createSharedTask<void()>( \
+ [=] () { \
+ dataLog(toCString(testStr, "...\n")); \
+ test(a.value, b.value, c.value); \
+ dataLog(toCString(testStr, ": OK!\n")); \
+ })); \
+ } \
+ } \
+ }
void run(const char* filter)
{
@@ -16780,6 +16966,8 @@
RUN_BINARY(testBitAndArgImmFloat, floatingPointOperands<float>(), floatingPointOperands<float>());
RUN_BINARY(testBitAndImmsFloat, floatingPointOperands<float>(), floatingPointOperands<float>());
RUN_BINARY(testBitAndArgsFloatWithUselessDoubleConversion, floatingPointOperands<float>(), floatingPointOperands<float>());
+ RUN_BINARY(testBitAndNotNot, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
+ RUN_BINARY(testBitAndNotImm, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
RUN(testBitOrArgs(43, 43));
RUN(testBitOrArgs(43, 0));
@@ -16842,6 +17030,10 @@
RUN_BINARY(testBitOrArgImmFloat, floatingPointOperands<float>(), floatingPointOperands<float>());
RUN_BINARY(testBitOrImmsFloat, floatingPointOperands<float>(), floatingPointOperands<float>());
RUN_BINARY(testBitOrArgsFloatWithUselessDoubleConversion, floatingPointOperands<float>(), floatingPointOperands<float>());
+ RUN_TERNARY(testBitOrAndAndArgs, int64Operands(), int64Operands(), int64Operands());
+ RUN_BINARY(testBitOrAndSameArgs, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
+ RUN_BINARY(testBitOrNotNot, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
+ RUN_BINARY(testBitOrNotImm, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
RUN_BINARY(testBitXorArgs, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
RUN_UNARY(testBitXorSameArg, int64Operands());
@@ -16880,6 +17072,8 @@
RUN(testBitXorImmBitXorArgImm32(7, 2, 3));
RUN(testBitXorImmBitXorArgImm32(6, 1, 6));
RUN(testBitXorImmBitXorArgImm32(24, 0xffff, 7));
+ RUN_TERNARY(testBitXorAndAndArgs, int64Operands(), int64Operands(), int64Operands());
+ RUN_BINARY(testBitXorAndSameArgs, int64Operands(), int64Operands());
RUN_UNARY(testBitNotArg, int64Operands());
RUN_UNARY(testBitNotImm, int64Operands());
