> In the Chrome tree, every object inheriting from RefCounted incurs > an extra pointer in size, but this is clearly more than necessary > since many RefCounted objects do not have bindings.
If we believe that JS wrappers are relatively uncommon, we can store them in a Node's "rare data" structure, and bloat only those uncommon nodes that have JS wrappers. If we believe that JS wrappers are relatively common, we can store them directly in a Node, since putting them in a hashtable is net more memory use. Non-Node wrappers are another story. Perhaps they are all uncommon enough to go in a hash table. Geoff _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
