06.05.2009, в 23:09, Michael Nordman написал(а):

There is no means for the system to distinguish between these two
cases. There is no API to indicate which use is which.


The first use case (just speeding things up) sounds like something that should be handled by a normal HTTP cache, as defined in RFC 2616. Is it inadequate? If it is, maybe it should be improved instead of making an additional entirely different caching mechanism?

- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov


_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to