Darren VanBuren onekop...@gmail.com ==================== http://oks.tumblr.com/
On Jun 5, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2009-06-05, at 19:02, Darren VanBuren wrote:Surprisingly, the bug isn't a duplicate, or if there is a dupe, it isn't filed correctly.But I agree that any code review tool should be integrated with bugs.webkit.org, otherwise there would be a huge disorganized mess and it wouldn't be any better.Bugzilla wouldn't be hard to extend for this purpose, just adding a field for review status and then making whatever code review tool you chose update Bugzilla solves (b).Some modifications in the tool could also make it attach the patches to a bug, and you could also update any field in the bug.I mean, retiveld seems like a wonderful tool, it seems like something that would extend Bugzilla quite nicely. Pushing data to Bugzilla can simply be done with XML-RPC according to this page on bugzilla.org: http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/tip/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.html and there's plenty of XML libraries for Python you could use to work over XML-RPC.I don't think that duplicating data in two systems and pushing it back and forth via an RPC mechanism is what Dave had in mind when he was speaking of tight integration. We need to *streamline* the process of uploading and reviewing a patch, and having two different ways to do this seems like a large step in the opposite direction.- Mark
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
