The license is assigned on a per-file basis and can be found at the top of the file.
2009/6/12 David Jones <ds...@163.com> > well, is there a doc about that? > or, could you describe it more detailedly ? I want to know which part is > under BSD, LGPL and so on. > I don't find a license illustration in webkit's src. > > >On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44:25PM -0700, Peter Kasting wrote: > >> 2009/6/11 David Jones <ds...@163.com> > >> > >> > As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty , > >> > there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome: > >> > BSD <http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php>/LGPL 2/LGPL > 21<http://opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.php> > >> > > >> > > >> > Why? > >> > > >> > >> For the same reason the Mozilla code lists three licenses: because the > code > >> is tri-licensed. It is offered simultaneously under three different > >> licenses. > > > >Technically, that is not true. While (most of) Mozilla code is > >effectively tri-licensed, i.e released under the terms of the three > >licences, WebKit code is partly licensed under each one, i.e. parts are > >under 2-clause BSD, parts under 3-clause BSD, and parts under LGPL 2 or > >2.1. > > > >Mike > > > ------------------------------ > 网易全新推出企业邮箱 <http://qiye.163.com/?ft=2> > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
