On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Joseph Pecoraro <joepec...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8: 32PM, Darin Adler wrote: >> >>> I’m a little irritated that we’re changing our Subversion scripts, >>> svn-create-patch, svn-apply, and svn-unapply into WebKit-specific scripts. >>> Previously, they were scripts that were independent of the particular >>> project that enhanced Subversion in a non-project-specific way. I used the >>> WebKit version on many projects other than the WebKit project. >>> >>> I think the names should change if we’re changing them to do >>> WebKit-specific things. >>> >> >> I don't think the change I did before was WebKit specific. And the >> changes (not committed) to svn-[un]apply only reflect the changes to >> svn-create-patch, but are again not WebKit specific. These changes ensure >> that patches are created and applied from the root of any SVN Repository >> (which in fact is what git does by default and makes the most sense by >> removing any possible ambiguity or forcing someone to know which directory >> they should apply a patch). There has been some loss of functionality [1], >> but that can be fixed. >> >> [1] Create a patch without svn-create-patch which contains paths not from >> the repository's root and then attempting to use svn-apply or svn-unapply to >> deal with the patch. >> >> These are the only changes I know of. If there are any others its >> possible they may be WebKit specific. > > > Even if they were WebKit specific, I guess i don't see what the problem > would be. After all, the tools are checked into WebKitTools in the webkit > repository. Making them more useful for WebKit development at the expense > of other development seems like an OK trade-off to me. > > > Note that you could always grab a version of the files from back when they > behaved the way you wanted and stick them in ~/bin (or some other dir on > your path). > > > FWIW Darin wrote the original CVS-based versions of these tools. That's not > to say he owns their descendants forever, but telling him he should go to > extraordinary lengths to make use of them for other purposes seems a little > presumptuous. > I wasn't aware of that. I guess that kind of does change things. :-)
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev