KwangYul, have you considered using gyp (and the files already there) rather than add another generating solution? Jason, have you considered using gyp to generate your solution?
Disclaimer: I have no stake in gyp nor do I think it is necessarily better than anything else, but I do care about not modifying 7+ build files for any file additions/moves, etc. dave On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jason Rukman <[email protected]> wrote: > That's great news... How far away are you from getting this build toolchain > working? > > I want to upstream the API once I work out how we can integrate our > changes; which I think means that first we need a build environment that can > build our changes. > > We are still working on the LayoutTests right now so I'm not sure. > > -----Original Message----- > From: KwangYul Seo [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:46 AM > To: Jason Rukman > Cc: Webkit Development List > Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build > > Hi, Jason. > > I don't think it is a good idea to add separate solution and vcproj > files for Windows Mobile. > > Windows Mobile is just a small part of Windows CE. Windows CE covers > multiple CPU architectures (ARM, MIPS, ..) and platforms with varying > features. I hope the build system covers multiple configurations > easily. vcproj file is too verbose and not easy to maintain to keep > multiple configurations as we can see from Windows port. > > If we are going to add a build system for Windows CE, I think we need > a more clever way to deal with this problem. I am currently working on > a build system which generates MSVS solution and vcproj files from a > build script. The sole purpose of this build system is to support > multiple Windows CE platforms and configurations from a single script. > I'd like to contribute this work once it is ready. > > By the way, what is your contribution plan? Do you plan to contribute > WebKit API and layout tests? > > Regards, > Kwang Yul Seo > > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason Rukman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I’d like to > start > > merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an > approach. > > We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow > > the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build > configuration. > > > > > > > > Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution > configuration > > to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or > > should we check in our version of the solution and project files > separately > > (and where?) I don’t like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files > but > > as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to > have > > the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need > to > > confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command > > line though. I’ve had some success merging changes between vcproj files > so > > it’s possible this might be automated. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
