Thanks to all, the bug is here: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41878
I've added link to tracking Chromium bug as well. Dmitry On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> wrote: > That would be the standard thing to do. > > The sooner someone gets started on the feature, the easier it'll be to > revert the patch that removes the code. :-) > > J > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, David Levin <le...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter Kasting <pkast...@google.com>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Dmitry Titov <dim...@chromium.org>wrote: >>> >>>> I'd lean to the removal, unless there is a port that has work ongoing or >>>> planned soon for those implementations. >>>> >>>> Does anybody vote for #ifdefs? >>>> >>> >>> I vote against removal if only because Chromium has really wanted these >>> badly for a long time and simply hasn't been able to find someone to >>> implement them. Perhaps I could make it worth your while to implement >>> rather than remove the stubs? :) >>> >> >> *Even if someone to implement them for chromium, it doesn't seem to fix >> the overall problem. *Dmitry indicated that the presences of these is >> breaking feature detection in browsers using WebKit (-- which is something >> being heard from web developers). >> >> A simple solution is to remove them. Later, any port (including chromium) >> who gets someone to work on them could re-add these methods back properly >> under ifdef's. >> >> dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
