So what is the process then if you have a blog ready to post? Just get one 
person to review?

On 2 ʻAok 2010, at 9:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> 
> I agree that it would be good to have more useful and interesting content. I 
> don't think it's good to do this by forcing the task on new reviewers. Not 
> everyone enjoys a writing exercise and it shouldn't be required to become a 
> reviewer. However, I encourage people to post about cool WebKitty stuff!
> 
>  - Maciej
> 
> On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote:
> 
>> The Surfin' Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev 
>> community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: 
>> blog.chromium.org has 17k and blog.mozilla.com has 10k. However, the last 
>> post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we've 
>> written 8 "X is a now a WebKit reviewer" posts. One recent commenter said:
>> 
>> "I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land 
>> worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t 
>> nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I 
>> know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit 
>> awesomeness?"
>> 
>> I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by 
>> changing the tradition for new reviewer posts.
>> 
>> Instead of defaulting to:
>> 
>>   So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer
>>   Posted by Someone-else
>>   So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure...
>> 
>> We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like:
>> 
>>   How awesome-infrastructure works
>>   Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer
>>   Here's my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit...
>> 
>>   -OR-
>> 
>>   Awesome-feature is the new hotness
>>   Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer
>>   Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here's how it works...
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> -Tony
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to