I suspect that Maciej is right and whatever speedup we would see would be inconsequential. It's still a slightly cleaner design to not have to shell out to Ruby from Python, jumping from one scripting language to another. The deadlocking issue is a serious issue, blocking us from increasing our usage of new-run-webkit-tests, but simply porting PrettyPatch isn't going to fix it (for the record, I am actively working on fixing the deadlocking issue).
But until we can put a stake into old-run-webkit-tests, we can't delete the ruby version anyway (well, I guess we could shell out from Perl to Python, but that would be only slightly less goofy). -- Dirk On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I didn't see your second post either. Sounds like porting everything > into Python would speed up new-run-webkit-tests? Then I'm all for it. I > think other folks would be equally convinced as well if you could kindly > measure the time difference between Ruby + Python + shell script > implementation vs Python implementation. > - Ryosuke > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Sam, >> >> Did you see the reply I sent on this thread? There are actually decent >> reasons to rewrite the code into Python, to simplify and speed up the >> new-run-webkit-tests implementation. Given that, do you still object >> to the patch landing (since the work has already been done)? >> >> -- Dirk >> >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Sam Weinig <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Sorry, I seemed to have missed this thread. Please do not rewrite >> > scripts >> > just to rewrite them in a language you like. WebKit's dependency on Ruby >> > is >> > here to stay. Just because python is common at Google does not make it >> > universal. >> > -Sam >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, TAMURA, Kent <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> So porting PrettyPatch to Python will make good benefit and should have >> >> no >> >> drawbacks. I should go ahead. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 09:21, William Siegrist <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Aug 31, 2010, at 4:43 PM, TAMURA, Kent wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Can we run python scripts on bugs.webkit.org server? >> >>> >> >>> Yes. >> >>> >> >>> -Bill >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> TAMURA Kent >> >> Software Engineer, Google >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> webkit-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > webkit-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
