On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Darin Adler wrote:

> Before we move LayoutTests, we might want to discuss further changes to 
> structure.
> 
> Mark Rowe and I talked about this briefly and he suggested a top level with 
> just:
> 
>    Examples
>    Sources
>    Tests
>    Tools
>    Websites
> 
> And perhaps one or two files. Maybe Makefile.
> 
> For Apple internal purposes it would be valuable to have a Sources directory 
> that contained all the source code and did not contain any tests. In fact, 
> that would set us on a path that would allow us to eliminate the 
> ForwardingHeaders machinery.
> 
> If we plan to do the above, then Tests/RegressionTests might be the best 
> directory for what is currently in LayoutTests. Another thing to consider is 
> what other types of tests we have. Regression tests as opposed to what other 
> tests?

We have some test suites (CSS 2.1, SVG, canvas etc) that are not strictly 
regression tests, but are still useful to run to catch regressions. We can 
expect some of these suites to become very large.

Simon

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to