On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Joe Mason wrote: > > > I took a look at CodeGeneratorJS.pm to see how hard it would be to port > this over. I have no idea where to start… The structure of > CodeGeneratorJS.pm and CodeGeneratorV8.pm seem quite different. This also > seems like a lot of work to do just to enable/disable one feature, but I > guess if there’s no framework for enabling/disabling JS features in JSC at > all then it’s necessary. > > I’m sad that the V8 code generator script diverged so much from the > original. It would be great if they were kept closer. I have refactored them > to become more similar and even share code whenever I had to modify both, > such as when making changes to [Reflect]. > > > Is there wide agreement that porting the RuntimeEnabledFeatures to JSC is > a good idea? > > I think it would probably be good. Not sure why the person who did it > originally did it V8-only. > > IIRC, there was not much interest from JSC-using ports for RuntimeEnabledFeatures. -Darin
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
