I finally have a theory: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55164
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Michael Nordman <[email protected]> wrote: > lighttpd+cgiphp is not super reliable... i think that accounts for > some amount of chromium's http test flakiness on windows. > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Julie Parent <[email protected]> > wrote: >> For Chromium, the http tests aren't very flaky on Mac (I see only 5 flaky >> http tests). Windows, however, is another story. >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Looking at the Chromium Flakiness dashboard (which has results going >>>> back for months!) we see that many of the same http tests are flaky >>>> for chromium too: >>>> http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html >>>> >>>> I believe they use a different http server (lighttpd, but my >>>> information could be old?) and certainly a separate network stack. >>> >>> We use lighttpd only on Windows. It's been on our long-term TODO list to >>> use apache on Windows again, but getting it to work on Vista/Win7 has proven >>> tricky. >>> Ojan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
