On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Mark Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there some reason why these examples use manufactured Safari build > numbers? It's implausible that a version of Safari with a build number of > 534.24 would ever claim to be version 5.0.3. >
Sorry, I wasn't sure what the right numbers were. What would be a more accurate number? I'd be happy to change it. PK
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
