Sounds good to me. Both patches have been updated to use -webkit. Thank you for the explanation.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Dan Bernstein wrote: > > I think Eric is not asking about the unicode-bidi property, but rather about > the isolate value, which is not in CSS 2.1. I don’t know that there’s a > guideline, but there is precedent for prefixing values (for example, > display: box and display: inline-box), so I would recommend prefixing the > new unicode-bidi value as well. > > The reason for prefixing is to be able to preserve compatibility if the > meaning of “isolate” changes during the rest of the standardization process, > but content relies on what we implement in WebKit. > We should add a prefix. > It will help us if the final “isolate” turns out to have a different meaning > that it has in the current draft. Using the prefix gives us more options if > that happens. We could keep our current meaning under the name > “-webkit-isolate” if necessary. If things go well then “-webkit-isolate” > will just be a synonym for “isolate”. > -- Darin > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
