Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 20, 2011, at 21:33, Brent Fulgham <[email protected]> wrote: > As I sat tonight, waiting for my local repository to update (~1 hour and > counting at this point), I had a bit of free time to contemplate the > ever-growing size of the platform results of the layout test archive. Over > the last couple of years, the amount of time spent waiting for my local > archive to sync with the main repository has grown considerably. And no > wonder, we have a great number of new ports and variants using WebKit, all > with their own quirks and unique results. It's wonderful diversity, and a > great metric of how vibrant and enthusiastic a community we have. > > But to be honest, I'm TIRED of the huge update times! > > My initial knee-jerk reaction was to blame this on the multitude of Chromium > layout archives (16 at last count). Clearly this is needless bloat -- after > all, what could possibly be the difference between "chromium-linux-x86_64" > and "google-chrome-linux64". Why are these even distinct entities? ;-) > > But my initial bias was not fact-based. While there are a great number of > directories, they only weight in at 784 MB of data. > > The bulk of the results is due to Apple's various ports (although limited to > a relatively parsimonious 8 directories); they total a bit over 1 GB of data. In the case of updating, isn't it more interesting to look at which ports update expectations more often? Presumably you paid the cost of the initial checkout some time ago. -Andy > > Gtk at Qt are downright tiny, at 366 MB and 229 MB (respectively). > > All told we have over 2 GB of data that has to be downloaded to each > developer's machine before they get the first line of compilable code. Very > few of us ever use more than a handful of these different platform results. > > I have a crappy DSL connection, so it's slow. Since I don't have metered > bandwidth, the amount of data doesn't matter that much from a price > standpoint, but it's quite annoying from a wasted time standpoint. I also > feel very bad for anyone trying to work on WebKit from behind a metered > network connection. > > Is there any way we can tame this explosive growth? Could platform results > be located in a separate archive, so that they don't have to be constantly > synced across all platforms? > > Help! > > Thanks, > > -Brent > > > ======= As of 4-20-2011 ====== > android: 56 KB (12 files) > android-v8: 56 KB (20 files) > chromium: 7.25 MB (400 files) > chromium-gpu: 504 KB (78 files) > chromium-gpu-linux: 5.36 MB (313 files) > chromium-gpu-mac: 5.68 MB (251 files) > chromium-gpu-win: 6.98 MB (469 files) > chromium-linux: 274 MB (12,139 files) > chromium-linux-x86_64: 2.99 MB (155 files) > chromium-mac: 83.2 MB (2,582 files) > chromium-mac-leopard: 87.9 MB (2,391 files) > chromium-win: 293 MB (17,739 files) > chromium-win-vista: 1.19 MB (163 files) > chromium-win-xp: 2.12 MB (265 files) > google-chrome-linux32: 12.9 MB (523 files) > google-chrome-linux64: 972 KB (56 files) > > TOTAL: 784 MB (37,556 files) > > gtk: 366 MB (17,396 files) > > mac: 604 MB (20,686 files) > mac-leopard: 389 MB (10,169 files) > mac-snowleopard: 592 KB (103 files) > mac-tiger: 9.61 MB (311 files) > mac-wk2: 480 KB (86 files) > win: 15.9 MB (972 files) > win-wk2: 432 KB (89 files) > win-xp: 1.26 MB (111 files) > > TOTAL: 1.02 GB (32,527 files) > > qt: 229 MB (11,876 files) > qt-linux: 24.0 KB (8 files) > qt-mac: 16.0 KB (3 files) > qt-win: 16.0 KB (3 flles) > qt-wk2: 305 KB (3 files) > > TOTAL: 229 MB (11,893 files) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
