On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Ojan Vafai <o...@chromium.org> wrote: > I think we should be able to make everyone happy if we handle these the same > way we handle the EWS and style bots. > The data lives on another server (appengine in this case) and is brought > into the bugzilla page via an iframe. We could have an iframe for the Qt > release that is empty by default, but shows a link to the release when that > patch has been integrated into a branch.
Hi Ojan. I'm not sure I understand what you mean... Could you give me an example? Thanks, - Ademar > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:29 PM, James Robinson <jam...@google.com> wrote: >> >> I find these cherry-pick bug comments annoying and hope that you will stop >> generating them. There are many ports that make releases based off of >> WebKit trunk, and all of them have some notion of release branches that >> contain cherry-picked revisions, reverts, etc. As a developer it's nearly >> always irrelevant to me whether a given patch is cherry-picked into a given >> Qt release or not, just as it would be to know if that revision was >> cherry-picked into a given Gtk, EFL, Safari, or Chromium release branch. >> When I do need to know the status of a specific branch, I look in the >> port-specific location of the branch to see what happened. For example, to >> see what's in a given chromium release I look in the appropriate >> subdirectory of http://trac.webkit.org/browser/branches/chromium. For the >> Safari 534 >> branch, http://trac.webkit.org/browser/branches/safari-534-branch etc. >> I would recommend that the people who work on QtWebKit figure out a way to >> track revisions in their release branches in a way that does not involve >> spamming non-Qt bugs on bugs.webkit.org or developers who aren't working >> directly on Qt. >> - James >> >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Antonio Gomes <toniki...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> An important question: besides the notification e-mails, does the rest >>>> of our release process bothers someone? >>>> >>> Not me. It works fine and is very transparent. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --Antonio Gomes >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > -- Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. <ademar.r...@openbossa.org> Nokia Institute of Technology _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev