28.06.2011, в 8:39, Mossman, Paul (Paul) написал(а):
> Can this behaviour be implemented in WebKit as the resolution to issue 41419?
Which of the below most accurately describes what you would like implemented?
Some of these would actually be WebKit issues.
1. If the user has already accepted an invalid certificate for an https
document, the same certificate should be silently accepted when talking to a
WebSocket server on the same domain and port.
2. If the user has already accepted an invalid certificate for an https
document, any invalid certificate should be silently accepted when talking to a
WebSocket server on the same domain and port.
3. If the user has already accepted an invalid certificate for an https
document, any invalid certificate should be silently accepted when talking to
any WebSocket server.
4. If an invalid certificate is presented for a WebSocket connection, the
browser should display a confirmation dialog akin to the one for https.
5. As the only good use for invalid certificates is development, there should
be an option in browser's Development menu to disable certificate checks,
perhaps until browser restart or just in current window. We don't want users to
make the decision whether an invalid certificate means that they are unsafe.
6. Something different.
There is a large movement in the opposite direction - browsers are going to
completely block any content that is even remotely suspicious from security
point of view. I am surprised that Chromium is so forgiving in this case.
- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
