> I also think it’s good to have a WebKit-specific or specific-enough word in
> script names when possible so you can have the scripts in your path even when
> not working on WebKit. That’s why run-webkit-tests has the word WebKit in it,
> and run-safari does not.
I'd suggest one script -- run-webkit-tests -- with flags for including or
excluding specific testing (layout tests, unit tests, bindings tests, etc.).
That way, there's only one name to remember, you get a sensible default, and
you can always use --help to figure special subtest settings as necessary.
(I think a little bike shedding is OK here, since this is a tool we all use
every day.)
Geoff
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
