Hi, Am 13.09.2011 um 21:37 schrieb Adam Roben:
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Leandro Pereira wrote: > >> Antonio, >> >> On 09/13/2011 04:00 PM, Antonio Gomes wrote: >>> >>> I believe it was maintained by Torch Mobile, and, according to George >>> Staikos, it is not part of the plans any more (Torch was acquired by RIM). >>> >> >> AFAIR, Patrick Gansterer (paroga) is still working on the WinCE port. He >> usually informally reviews CMake-related changes. > > I believe this is correct. He also maintains a buildbot: > http://build.webkit.org/builders/WinCE%20Release%20%28Build%29 Yes, that's correct. How do we measure an "active port"??? I maintain a buildbot for WinCe and usually fix problems with the port within hours. Unfortunately I don't get paid to work on WebKit the whole day and so I can't make such big steps forward like other ports do. Other active ports (e.g. wx) don't even have a buildbot and get maintained too. Some configuration like BREWMP or HAIKU don't have buildbot and I can't see any build fixes or _upstraeming_ activity for them within the last months. So PLEASE: When do we call a port "active"? It's not cool to get the question about removal every few months! -- Patrick _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev