On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Roland Steiner <rolandstei...@google.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglaz...@chromium.org>wrote: > >> Yeah. You're right. We should get Hixie to change the spec. I don't >> think we should implement currently spec'd behavior or change the >> name. That last option sounds exceptionally bad. Roland, can you post >> on that thread and request the spec change? >> > > Posted. :) > In those threads it seems we arrived at a preliminary agreement: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Roland Steiner wrote: > > > > Hm, AFAICT Hixie's mail on www-style@ didn't raise any objections > > against the idea [of scoped selectors] itself, the discussion just > revolves around what the > > exact syntax should be. Given that, what is the chance that we are able > > to go forward and declare selectors within <style scoped> as scoped, and > > leave the question how such selectors can "breach" the scoping as an > > orthogonal problem? > > Go for it. I recommend going with [@global] for now, too. Unless a better > proposal gets put forward, I'll spec it in the near future. (So far > nothing better has been put forward.) In this light, are there any remaining objections to implement this with 'scoped' as the attribute name? Cheers, - Roland
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev