How about classes that are only used in one cpp file? Should we be wrapping those in an anonymous namespace?
- Ryosuke On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Darin Adler <da...@apple.com> wrote: > The guideline is not to disallow anonymous namespaces. > > It’s to prefer “static” over anonymous namespaces when either one would > work. > > Debugging tools on at least some of the platforms work better with > functions that are given internal linkage by using the “static” keyword > rather than functions that are inside anonymous namespaces. > > On the other hand, anonymous namespaces are a more powerful tool that can > do more than the “static” keyword can. > > -- Darin > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
