In my opinion, the bison parser implements LR analyzer, handwritten parser implements Top-To-Down analyzer. I remember some compiling book says "LR analyzer is better and faster than Top-To-Down analyzer". So, your opinon confuses me. Could you give me more information about speed of handwritten parser?
At 2011-11-30 15:47:43,"Oliver Hunt" <[email protected]> wrote: The handwritten parser has numerous benefits over the old bison generated one, the most basic being: * It's more than 2 times faster than the bison parser * It doesn't require complete duplication of the grammar to support strict mode (and can identify strict mode in the first place) * It fixes a number of bugs inherent in the bison parser due to the way automatic semicolon insertion was implemented. There are a number of other benefits, but those are the most obvious. --Oliver On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:38 PM, PandaCanFly wrote: Hello everyone, I am researching WEBKIT and coming up against difficulty about Javascript parser。As I Know, WEBKIT of old version uses the bison parser to interpret javascript code. But WEBKIT of recently version doesn't uses bison parser. Instead, WEBKIT of recently version uses Top-To-Down Recursion parser. I have some details to add. 1) WEBKIT using bison parser has a source file named "Grammar.cpp". 2) I know WEBKIT with 38688 version number uses bison parser. I hope someone can give me some explanation, thanks. _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
