Just be careful with copyright issues. Regards, Zoltan
> Go for it. > > Adam > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Sergio Villar Senin <svil...@igalia.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been thinking about this for some time now, but only a recent bug >> I'm constantly hitting these days >> (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76574) triggered this email >> [1]. What I would like to propose here is to have a battery of tests >> that would check that the most visited sites (let's say the top 100 for >> example) are correctly loaded by WebKit. By correctly loaded, I don't >> mean layout or ref tests, they'll just check that the page poad ends >> without any assertion. >> >> I know that trunk is for raw development but having >25k layout tests >> passing is nothing if a so popular site as Wikipedia triggers an >> assertion while being loaded. The obvious answer is "ok so we need more >> tests", we all agree on that, but having like "real-word" permanent >> tests would not harm I guess (and probably help defining more layout >> tests). >> >> I haven't took a detailed look at them, but maybe these main sites >> browsing tests could be part of the perf tests rniwa and others recently >> setup. >> >> What do you think? >> >> BR >> >> [1] note that I am not blaming anyone in particular, we all add bugs, >> just that this one finally flipped the switch :) >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
