I will also post the results split out by contribution level once the survey closes.
Regards, Maciej On Mar 10, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Jon Lee wrote: > Direct link to results: > http://kwiksurveys.com/results-overview.php?surveyID=LODHNK_f6f04dad&mode=4 > > On Mar 10, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I made a bad choice of survey site. They want to charge me to see more than >> 100 responses or to export the data, but they won't take my money. Sadness. >> Please try this survey instead, it will run through the 17th. >> >> http://kwiksurveys.com?s=LODHNK_f6f04dad >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> >> On Mar 10, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mar 10, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Unfortunately SurveyMonkey sucks and I can't give everyone access to live >>>> responses without paying them money. Current results: >>>> >>>> - 97 people have answered >>>> - About 67% use Git only (this has been consistent throughout the survey) >>>> - Aabout 20% use Subversion only >>>> - About 13% use Git and Subversion >>>> - No one checked "Other" >>>> >>>> As far as contribution levels of the responders: >>>> >>>> - 37% are WebKit reviewers >>>> - 25% are WebKit committers >>>> - 25% are WebKit contributors (but presumably not committers or reviewers >>>> yet) >>>> - 13% are not WebKit contributors >>>> >>>> Can we see the breakdown of git/svn users among reviewers & committers? >>>> >>>> I'm not certain if it's really useful to consider votes casted by >>>> non-contributors here since we're presumably not trying to decide which >>>> version control system is more popular in general public. >>> >>> I would indeed like to get the contributor-only (and >>> reviewer/committer-only) statistics, but I'm having trouble upgrading to >>> the "pro" account that would enable this. I'll post the data once I have it. >>> >>> I do think it is somewhat interesting to find out what non-contributors who >>> nontheless check out source are using to access the WebKit repository. The >>> fact that so many people use Git says to me that our basic checkout >>> instructions should include the relevant git instructions as an >>> alternative. SVN instructions are on the main site at >>> <http://www.webkit.org/building/checkout.html> but Git instructions are >>> buried in the wiki. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Maciej >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev