On Jul 19, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Antti Koivisto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> kirjoitti 20.7.2012 kello 0.27: > >> >> In principle, we could also have this support multiple arguments, so you >> could write: >> >> debug("frame: ", someFrame, " node: ", someNode, " string", someString); > > I think this is the way to go for the easy syntax. A format string version > should also be available. I'm totally on board with this, too. ~Brady > > > antti > >> >> This would be no more verbose than the << style, but could compile to a >> single function call at the call site and therefore could be relatively >> compact. I would find this easier to deal with than a unary function or a >> printf-style format string. The way you'd do this is by defining template >> functions which call a unary overloaded function for each argument: >> >> template<typename A, typename B> debug(A a, B b) >> { >> debug(a); >> debug(b); >> } >> >> template<typename A, typename B, typename C> debug(A a, B b, C c) >> { >> debug(a); >> debug(b); >> debug(c); >> } >> >> template<typename A, typename B, typename C, typename D> debug(A a, B b, C >> c, D d) >> { >> debug(a); >> debug(b); >> debug(c); >> debug(d); >> } >> >> ... and so on up to some reasonable number of arguments. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
