On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Elliott Sprehn <espr...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Bruno Abinader <brunoabina...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Hi all :) > > As suggested by Ojan, I am writing a mail to you about my intention to > implement all updated and missing text-decoration* properties from > CSS3 spec (currently in development), named below: > > -webkit-text-decoration ( https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92000 ) > CSS3 dev spec: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-decoration > Mozilla ref: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/text-decoration > Status: Proposed patch / pending review > > It seems weird to have a prefixed version of text-decoration instead of just > making text-decoration allow the new prefixed keywords. > > What's the reason for having a whole new prefixed property? Making regular text-decoration accept prefixed keywords for the new/unstable tuff sounds like a good approach to me. I too am curious why that is not proposed. - Maciej
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
