On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Eric Seidel <e...@webkit.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Benjamin Poulain <benja...@webkit.org> > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, James Hawkins <jhawk...@chromium.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> A few details: > >> * Google will front the cost of the license (non-zero...very far from > >> zero) and the infrastructure. > >> * I'd leave it up to the WebKit leadership to decide who has access > (most > >> likely limited to WebKit committers for security purposes). > >> > >> The biggest rationale is to provide a strong defect signal for the > entire > >> WebKit community, which would directly impact the success of all > >> WebKit-based projects. Coverity has provided free licenses for > unsponsored > >> (by larger corporations anyway) open-source projects; this has resulted > in > >> significant improvements [2] to the code bases of these projects, one of > >> which I was directly involved with years ago (Wine). > > > > > > I am a little skeptical of Coverity because of bad patches that > originated > > for its report (sometimes even discussed on webkit-dev). I think we > should > > keep in mind the tool also make many mistakes and we should not blindly > > follows it. > > > > Could this be integrated with the EWS like a kind of advanced "style > check"? > > I think this is a great idea, and would be trivial if coverity could > be convinced to run on a diff file, or if we could wrap it in a script > to only report errors on the changed lines. Either sounds very > And/Or are we going to allow inline annotations? The practice Coverity suggested is to adding such annotations. http://scan.coverity.com/best-practice.html I personally think it's worth having inline annotations because it can also help human code readers, so I'm curious what other folks think about that. > doable. The EWS infrastructure is already in place once such a script > exists. > > Reporting possible improvements before patches lands would be more useful > > than a separate bot. > > > > Benjamin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-dev mailing list > > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev