On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ami Fischman <fisch...@chromium.org> wrote:
> The reality is that this "test coverage" today shows up as flakiness and > so is ignored anyway, meaning we don't actually have useful coverage here. > Even when flakiness is investigated, the "fix" is to cache-bust using > unique URL params, which just means we "lose" the coverage you describe for > that test, anyway. > When making cache related changes I have frequently found bugs from my patches because some seemingly random test started failing and I investigated. Without the test coverage some of those bugs would probably now be in the tree. antti > > Brian notes in the bug that GTK & wk2 GTK+ are done. > I believe that just leaves chromium & mac. > Anyone wanting to step up to do mac, and, I guess, wk2 mac? > > -a >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
