The point is that a rule mandating const methods to return const pointers prevents me from saying that getting a pointer from a container doesn't change the container.
Hence with any such rule in place you risk there being fewer uses of const. -Filip Dnia 28 paź 2012 o godz. 14:40 Peter Kasting <pkast...@chromium.org> napisał(a): > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpi...@apple.com> wrote: >> It is useful to say that "getting a pointer to T from an object of type S >> does not change S's state". > > That's pretty much the definition of physical constness. > > PK
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
