On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Rik Cabanier <caban...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Rik Cabanier <caban...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Maciej,
>> 
>> did this sound reasonable to you?
> 
> Still doesn't make sense to me. Even if we don't implement CSS 
> 'alpha-compositing' and 'blend-mode' today, I assume we will want to 
> implement them eventually. At that point we will want them consistent with 
> Canvas. If the only reason to combine compositing operator and blend modes is 
> short-term ease of implementation on Mac, then that doesn't seem like a great 
> reason to make the Web platform permanently inconsistent.
> 
>> Would you object if Canvas combines blending and compositing but not CSS?
> 
> Yes. I think they should be consistent and the relevant standards group (FX 
> Task Force?) should decide. It's not even very important to me which is 
> chosen. It just seems arbitrary that they would make different choices on 
> this, especially when it is all defined in the same spec.
> 
> 
> Thanks Maciej!
> I will bring this up on the FX mailing list.
> Depending on the outcome, I will amend the compositing spec.

Thanks, that would be much appreciated.

Cheers,
Maciej

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to