I noticed this comment on the Hacker News thread about Paul Irish's recent blog post:
---8<--- "CSS parsing is the same, though. Slurping up your CSS and turning it into CSSOM’s pretty standard. Yeah, though Chrome accepts just the -webkit- prefix whereas Apple and other ports accept legacy prefixes like -khtml- and -apple-." Using this information, can you target Chrome with the webkit- prefix and Safari with the apple- prefix? Specifying the apple- prefix after webkit- will ensure that Safari uses that one, right? --->8--- http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5302150 If developers start using this technique, it might be harder to remove these prefixes in the future. Chromium's experience removing these prefixes has been quite positive. We ran into one compatibility problem on apple.com, which Apple was gracious enough to fix. I'd recommend that the rest of the ports disable ENABLE(LEGACY_CSS_VENDOR_PREFIXES) to remove support for the -khtml- and -apple- CSS prefixes before it's too late. Adam _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev