If Qt is the way to support Windows, it would need some work to make it easy to integrate into an existing non-Qt Windows application. From memory, that isn't the easiest thing in the world to do.
From: Benjamin Poulain <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013 5:42 PM To: Justin Haygood <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Status of Windows Port? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Justin Haygood <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Considering Safari 6 is Mac only, and the departing of Chromium (the defacto Windows WebKit browser until yesterday) what is the current status of the Windows port? The webkit.org<http://webkit.org> instructions still reference Visual Studio 2005 for instance We should update that! Any interest in making it a first class citizen again so that Windows users can potentially have a official WebKit(2) browser and application developers have a more or less officially supported library that isn't Chromium based? There is one: Qt. The Qt port uses WebKit2 and supports Windows :) I would prefer seeing more work on existing stable ports to make them better rather than spreading the effort on a new port. Cheers, Benjamin
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
