Sent from my PDP-11
On Jun 7, 2013, at 6:18 AM, Simon Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on the fact that AtomicString is really a singleton string, I’d like to > suggest a new name for this class: > > Stringleton +1 > > Simon > > On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Brendan Long <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 06/01/2013 10:09 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >>> But the name did throw me, since I asked myself "what makes this more >>> 'atomic' than String, synchronicity wise"? I'm sure I'm not the only one >>> who wondered about this. >> Before asking this question I had assumed AtomicString was an atomic type >> (as in, safe to use in multi-threaded code). InternedString would have been >> more obvious, but the biggest problem was that searching for "WebKit >> AtomicString" didn't return any results that explained what it was. Now the >> top hit has an explanation, so it's not a big deal. > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
