On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Darin Adler <da...@apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > >> Why don't we call it requireStyleResolver() instead? > > I’m warming to this idea. Maybe we can use “require” as a term of art, > analogous to the way we use “create”, to mean “create if not already created”.
Since the fact that it returns a reference implies that it must create something if necessary, the “required” part of the name seems redundant. Why not just StyleResolver& styleResolver() requireStyleResolver() sounds like it would return a bool. Simon
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev