On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Timothy Hatcher <timo...@apple.com> wrote: >> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I have a serious suggestion - could we rename srcset to src-n >>> (literally, "src-n"), and then just ship it? This puns in three >>> interesting ways: > [...] >>> This'll let us ship now, and then continue to discuss src-N for a >>> while, with whatever solution we land on still having a consistent >>> name. Win for authors no matter what the result is. >> >> No, you are just asking for support to muddy the waters and make the web >> your science project. > > I have no idea what this means. Could you restate your objection in > some other way? This is just a renaming request, mind, for an > unreleased feature; it's not unusual. Literally supporting "src-n" just to test the waters with the idea of introducing src-1..src-99 later is just an abuse of the HTML language and developers attention. Design something right and support it forever. — Timothy Hatcher _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
