>> I think this use of “auto” is net harmful. > > I disagree. I think the use of auto is an improvement, because it makes it > less likely that we have something like the following: > > int wrong = something.get64BitInt(); // potential truncation
This argument is a red herring for two reasons: (1) The example under consideration does not return an integer. (2) The compiler warns about implicit integer truncation, and does not allow implicit truncation from int64 to int32 without a cast. > Don’t we have this same problem with all of our JavaScript, Python, and Ruby > code? We don’t have type specifications in those languages, but we manage to > build large software with them as well. To the contrary, we have never built anything the size of WebKit using Python. Geoff _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
