On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Geoffrey Garen <gga...@apple.com> wrote:
> auto children = elementChildren(*dummySpanAncestor);
> for (auto child = children.begin(), end = children.end(); child != end;
> ++child) {
> if (isSpanWithoutAttributesOrUnstyledStyleSpan(&*child))
> toRemove.append(&*child);
> }
This should be written with a C++11 loop:
for (auto& child : elementChildren(*dummySpanAncestor)) {
if (isSpanWithoutAttributesOrUnstyledStyleSpan(&child))
toRemove.append(&child);
}
Not sure if you would say that helps or hurts readability. I could easily
imagine either Element& or auto&; in cases like this where we don’t have to
name the iterator type we don’t need auto as much as in the non-C++-11-loop
where the iterator type strongly motivates it.
— Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
