> On Jan 22, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Of course, Chromium was more willing to incur the cost of keeping all of the 
> pixel tests up to date when trivial things changed the output

This comment, and much of the discussion, seems to be about pixel tests. But 
what does this have to do with reference tests?

— Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to