01.01.2016, 04:26, "Michael Catanzaro" <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 19:25 +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> Hi Yusuke, >> >> What is the status of this proposal? >> AFAICS there were no serious objections, quite the opposite, many >> people support your proposal (me too). However, no patches were >> landed yet. > > I only wonder why it is called Nix? Is it named for http://nixos.org/? > Or is just supposed to be a generic *nix Unix? Maybe a better name for > the port would simply be "jsc" or "js"...? It's just when I see "Nix" I > don't think "JSC only."
I agree, and this port can easily support Windows, invalidating "Nix" name. However, if we call this port "JSC", build-jsc --jsc will look strange, and build-webkit --jsc might be misunderstood as "build only JSC part of this port", i.e. as synonym of build-jsc. Does anyone have an idea how to name this port? > > Did you test this with build-jsc? I guess it's fine to make 'build- > webkit --nix' do the right thing, but I bet it'd be more convenient to > just use the build-jsc command. > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
