https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=270221&action=review
> On Jan 21, 2016, at 8:35 AM, Morten Stenshorne <msten...@opera.com> wrote: > > Thanks for your quick response! > > David Hyatt <hy...@apple.com> writes: > >> We are in favor of those properties. If you want to talk about “avoid” >> specifically offline, I outlined a plan for implementing that property >> in one of the webkit bugs (I’ll have to hunt down the link). I think >> it basically needs to work a bit like margin collapsing in the sense >> that you need to propagate out knowledge of the break intent at the >> top and bottom of blocks, and then “collapse” with adjacent blocks to >> determine what the break intent should be at a given position. >> >> dave >> >>> On Jan 19, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Morten Stenshorne <msten...@opera.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello WebKit! :) >>> >>> I'm planning to implement the CSS properties break-after, break-before >>> and break-inside [1] in Blink. As part of that process, I need to ask >>> other browser vendors about their views / plans regarding this web >>> platform feature. I'd especially like to know if you have anything >>> against implementing these properties (apart from priorities). >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> [1] https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5630943616303104 >>> >>> -- >>> ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- >>> ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ ----------------- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >> >> > > -- > ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- > ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ ----------------- _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
