On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > > IntegrationTests doesn't distinguish them from performance tests, or API > tests. And most test integration only incidentally. FunctionalTests doesn't > distinguish them from any of the other kinds of tests besides performance > tests. > > I think just plain Tests is better than calling out a characteristic that > isn't actually unique. It's by far the most common type of test we have, so > it's ok for it to be the unmarked category.
The problem with Tests is that it competes with Tools. (Renaming Tools is a lot harder not to mention it's a pretty descriptive name already). How about CorrectnessTests or CoreTests then? > I think the only names that are both accurate and unique are likely to be > bad for autocomplete (WebTests, WebContentTests, etc). I guess we can also move WebKit.xcworkspace into Source, and rename WebKitLibraries to SystemInterfaceLibraries (and maybe move into Source), and then move Websites into Tools. - R. Niwa _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
